Mapping an Invention to an Internal Product Roadmap

Due Diligence for Patents – Comparing your invention to an internal product roadmap.

Inventions with internal business value will map to your internal product roadmap. These patents are used to protect your products from direct copying and create a defensible space for you to operate.


There are two main factors to consider for this analysis: the likelihood of the invention shipping with a product and the relative importance of the invention. In order to score the internal business value, the two factors will be combined or multiplied.

Relating to the invention to the product line can be gauged on a five-point scale:

    5. Is the invention committed to ship in the current product cycle?
    4. Is the invention likely to ship in the following product cycle?
    3. Are resources committed to implementation?
    2. Feasibility stage resources only.
    1. No resources assigned to invention.

Relating the invention the product can be done quantitatively or qualitatively. A qualitative analysis may use a point scale such as:

    5. Key aspect of product strategy.
    4. Important aspect of product strategy.
    3. Key feature of product.
    2. Improvement to product.
    1. Supplemental aspect of product.

A quantitative analysis may attempt to find a dollar value of the invention to the product. The dollar value may be calculated by determining a cost to design around the feature, or by allocating a percentage of value of the total price of the product to the specific invention.

A design around cost analysis may evaluate the cost of producing the product with the invention against the cost of producing the product without the invention but with the same general benefit to the customer.

An allocation method may evaluate the market price of the end product with and without the invention.

The quantitative analyses may only be applicable in certain circumstances where the invention and product lend themselves to these types of analyses. When the quantitative analyses are available, they are generally preferable to qualitative analyses.

Check out our other posts on Patent Due Diligence.

1 Comment

  1. A good patent is easy to read | BlueIron, LLC on January 18, 2015 at 11:19 am

    […] *commercial value* of the patent is dependent on getting a good examination. Much of the criticism of patents is that […]