IP-Backed Lending & Strategic IP Governance

Your Patents Are Either Working Capital or Expensive Wallpaper

Non-dilutive IP-backed loans for companies with real intellectual property assets. Half the cost of venture capital. No equity surrendered.

$2M–$50M

Typical loan range

45–60 Days

Funding timeline

40–60%

Less than VC cost

0%

Equity dilution

IP-Backed Lending

Your patents are collateral. Your equity stays yours.

A $10M-revenue company with investment-grade patents can qualify for a $20M IP-backed loan. Non-dilutive capital that funds growth without surrendering ownership or board seats.

IP-backed lending works when the patents protect real revenue streams. Lenders evaluate claim quality, enforceability, and competitive positioning — not patent count. Five enforceable patents outperform fifty that describe your own product.

Who qualifies: U.S.-based companies with $5M+ revenue and issued utility patents protecting core technology.

Venture Capital IP-Backed Loan
Equity dilution 15–30% None
Board seats 1–2 seats None
Timeline 6–12 months 45–60 days
Cost of capital High (equity price) 40–60% less
Control Shared Retained
Collateral Your company Your patents

Capital Is One Outcome of Strategic IP

Companies that secure IP-backed lending have one thing in common: someone owns the strategic thesis behind the portfolio.

Not the attorney. Not the CTO. Someone with the patent fluency to evaluate enforceability and the business judgment to connect it to revenue.

Large companies call this role a Chief IP Officer. Growth-stage companies usually do not have one.

That gap affects both valuation and lending outcomes.

4–6 engagements per year

Fractional Chief IP Officer

For a small number of companies each year, we provide executive-level IP strategy oversight — aligning patent decisions with competitive leverage, enforcement readiness, and capital outcomes.

Your board sets business goals. Your patent attorney writes patents. The CIPO connects the two — with the framework and unbiased data to make confident investment decisions.

This is how Microsoft, Qualcomm, and IBM run their IP. A fractional CIPO delivers that level of strategic oversight — scaled to your stage, your portfolio, and your budget.

Invention Evaluation

Every invention assessed as a business investment before money is spent. Does it protect revenue? Can infringement be detected? Will it change competitor behavior?

Prosecution Direction

Every patent gets a prosecution playbook before outside counsel writes a single claim. Target competitors named. Design-around paths blocked. Budget set.

Quality Oversight

Every draft and office action response reviewed before submission. Non-compliant work returned for revision. Your standards enforced — without reading patent claims yourself.

Portfolio Deployment

Every patent has a job: lend against, license, enforce, sell, or let go. IP-backed lending, negotiation leverage, acquisition premium. Your board decides — with data.

From the Blog

The economics, incentives, and structural problems behind patent strategy.

Investing in Patents

The business case for patents that work as assets, not wallpaper.

Why 95% of patents are worthless. Why your attorney’s incentives don’t align with yours. And the decision framework that separates investment-grade patents from expensive wallpaper.

Covers making the business case for a patent, how startups use patents, managing the process, due diligence, and what good patents actually cost. Read free online or order a copy.

Ready to Put Your Patents to Work?

Whether you need capital, strategic oversight, or both — it starts with a conversation about what your portfolio is actually worth.