What is the XML declaration required for a “Sequence Listing XML”?
According to MPEP 2413.01(c), the XML declaration required for a “Sequence Listing XML” is: This declaration is specified in WIPO Standard ST.26, paragraph 39(a), and must be included in the “Sequence Listing XML” as per 37 CFR 1.833(b)(2)(i). To learn more: XML declaration Sequence Listing XML WIPO Standard ST.26 patent application biotechnology
Read MoreWhat format is required for submitting sequence listings under the new rules?
Under the new Sequence Rules, patent applicants must submit sequence listings in a specific format. MPEP 2412.01 states that “an applicant is required to submit sequence data… in eXtensible Markup Language (XML) format.” This XML file must conform to the requirements specified in 37 CFR 1.831 – 1.834, which in turn reference particular paragraphs of…
Read MoreCan I submit a Sequence Listing in XML format for applications filed before September 16, 2012?
Can I submit a Sequence Listing in XML format for applications filed before September 16, 2012? Yes, you can submit a Sequence Listing in XML format for applications filed before September 16, 2012, even though it’s not mandatory. According to MPEP 2415.01: “For applications filed prior to September 16, 2012, a Sequence Listing in XML…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of “written description” in interference proceedings?
The “written description” requirement is crucial in interference proceedings as it determines whether an applicant has demonstrated possession of the claimed invention. According to MPEP 2304.02(d), “The purpose of the written description requirement is to ensure that the specification reasonably conveys to those skilled in the art that the inventor had possession of the claimed…
Read MoreWhat is the “written description requirement” in patent law?
The written description requirement is a crucial aspect of patent law that ensures an inventor has adequately described their invention in the patent application. According to MPEP 2304.02(d), “The written description requirement is met so long as the application or priority application sufficiently described the subject matter to a person skilled in the art.” It’s…
Read MoreWhat is the relationship between the written description requirement and new matter?
The relationship between the written description requirement and new matter is explained in MPEP 2163.06: “The written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, is separate and distinct from the new matter prohibition of 35 U.S.C. 132(a).” This means that while both concepts are related to the content of…
Read MoreWhat constitutes a violation of the written description requirement when changing claim scope?
Changing the scope of claims after filing can violate the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) in several ways: Broadening claims by removing limitations Narrowing claims by adding unsupported elements Altering numerical range limitations Using claim language not synonymous with the original disclosure As stated in MPEP 2163.05: “The failure to meet the written…
Read MoreHow does the written description requirement apply to biological deposits in patent applications?
The written description requirement, as applied to biological deposits in patent applications, is based on 35 U.S.C. 112(a). According to MPEP 2411.01: “A rejection for lack of written description typically arises in the context that the application as filed does not contain a description to support an amendment to the specification or claims, although it…
Read MoreHow does the written description requirement apply to amended or new claims?
The written description requirement applies not only to original claims but also to amended and new claims introduced during prosecution. The MPEP 2163.01 states: “The fundamental factual inquiry is whether the specification conveys with reasonable clarity to those skilled in the art that, as of the filing date sought, applicant was in possession of the…
Read MoreWhat is the written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. 112(a)?
The written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) mandates that the specification must describe the claimed invention in sufficient detail to demonstrate to a person skilled in the art that the inventor had possession of the claimed invention at the time of filing. According to MPEP 2166, a rejection based on the written description requirement…
Read More