What is Form Paragraph 7.43.03 used for in patent examination?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Form Paragraph 7.43.03 is used when allowable subject matter has been indicated, but formal requirements are still outstanding. It states: “As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant’s reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a).” The MPEP 707.07(a) notes that this form paragraph is appropriate “when changes (for example, drawing corrections or corrections to the specification) must be made prior to allowance.” This informs the applicant of the need to address remaining formal issues before the application can be allowed. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Use Form Paragraph for Reproduced Code Sections MPEP 707 Permitted Conclusion Paragraph Required for All Actions MPEP 707 Recommended Form Paragraphs Must Conclude Actions MPEP 707 Recommended First Office Action Must Identify Allowed Claims MPEP 707 Examiner Must Thoroughly Study and Investigate Patent Applications MPEP 707 Required Examiner Must Thoroughly Study and Investigate Prior Art During Reexamination MPEP 707 Required Comprehensive Examination Required for Patentability and Compliance MPEP 707 Required International-Type Search Required for National Applications Filed After June 1, 1978 MPEP 707 Required Request for International-Type Search Report at National Examination MPEP 707 Permitted No Formal Search Report Required for Fee Refund in Later Filed International Application MPEP 707 Required Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What is the significance of 35 U.S.C. 301 in citing prior art? How should examiners address asserted advantages claimed by applicants? ...