What should an examiner do when they find allowable subject matter in a derivation proceeding?

When an examiner finds allowable subject matter in an application involved in a derivation proceeding, they should follow specific guidelines as outlined in MPEP 2311: “When the examiner has determined that either the petitioner’s or the respondent’s application (where applicable) has allowable subject matter with respect to any claim, the examiner should refrain from taking…

Read More

What happens if a nonelected species is found allowable in Markush claim examination?

If a nonelected species is found allowable during Markush claim examination, the examiner must follow specific procedures. According to MPEP 803.02: “If on examination the elected species is found to be anticipated or rendered obvious by prior art, the Markush claim and claims to the elected species will be rejected, and claims to the nonelected…

Read More

What is the “upon finding allowable subject matter” rule in Markush claim examination?

The “upon finding allowable subject matter” rule in Markush claim examination refers to the process where an examiner, upon finding allowable subject matter, extends the search to all members of the Markush group. This is explained in MPEP 803.02: “If the examiner determines that the elected species is allowable, the examination of the Markush claim…

Read More

How should an examiner handle formal requirements in Office actions?

According to MPEP 707.07(a), examiners should handle formal requirements in Office actions as follows: Include any form that lists informalities and additional formal requirements in the first action. When indicating allowable subject matter, call attention to 37 CFR 1.111(b) and state that a complete reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse…

Read More

How should examiners handle allowable subject matter in patent applications?

Examiners should proactively handle allowable subject matter in patent applications according to MPEP 707.07(j): For pro se applications, draft one or more claims for the applicant if patentable subject matter is disclosed but not properly claimed. When claims are allowable except for formal matters, offer constructive suggestions for correction. If some claims are clearly allowable,…

Read More

What is Form Paragraph 7.43.03 used for in patent examination?

Form Paragraph 7.43.03 is used when allowable subject matter has been indicated, but formal requirements are still outstanding. It states: “As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant’s reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a).” The MPEP 707.07(a)…

Read More

What are the form paragraphs used to indicate allowable subject matter in patent applications?

Patent examiners use specific form paragraphs to indicate allowable subject matter in patent applications. According to MPEP 707.07(j), the following form paragraphs are used: Form paragraph 7.43: Used for claims objected to as dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form. Form paragraph 7.43.01: Used for claims that…

Read More

What happens if a base claim is canceled or rejected?

The treatment of dependent claims when a base claim is canceled or rejected is addressed in MPEP 608.01(n): If the base claim has been canceled, a claim which is directly or indirectly dependent thereon should be rejected as incomplete. If the base claim is rejected, the dependent claim should be objected to rather than rejected,…

Read More