What are examples of claims that may qualify for streamlined eligibility analysis?

Claims that may qualify for streamlined eligibility analysis are those where eligibility is self-evident and do not attempt to tie up judicial exceptions. MPEP 2106.06(a) provides several examples:

  • A complex manufactured industrial product or process with meaningful limitations alongside a judicial exception
  • A robotic arm assembly with a control system using certain mathematical relationships
  • An artificial hip prosthesis coated with a naturally occurring mineral
  • Products with ancillary nature-based components, such as a cellphone with gold electrical contacts or a plastic chair with wood trim

The MPEP states:

“For instance, a claim directed to a complex manufactured industrial product or process that recites meaningful limitations along with a judicial exception may sufficiently limit its practical application so that a full eligibility analysis is not needed.”

These examples illustrate cases where the claims clearly do not attempt to monopolize a judicial exception and thus can be quickly determined as eligible through the streamlined analysis.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability, MPEP 2106.06 - Streamlined Analysis, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: Judicial Exceptions, patent claims, Self-Evident Eligibility, Streamlined Analysis Examples