How is constructive reduction to practice defined in patent interferences?
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
Constructive reduction to practice is a key concept in patent interference proceedings. The MPEP 2301.02 provides the following definition:
“Constructive reduction to practice means a described and enabled anticipation under 35 U.S.C. 102(g)(1), in a patent application of the subject matter of a count.”
Furthermore, the MPEP introduces the concept of earliest constructive reduction to practice:
“Earliest constructive reduction to practice means the first constructive reduction to practice that has been continuously disclosed through a chain of patent applications including in the involved application or patent. For the chain to be continuous, each subsequent application must comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 119-121, 365, or 386.”
In simpler terms, constructive reduction to practice occurs when a patent application fully describes and enables an invention, and the earliest such description that has been continuously maintained in a chain of applications is particularly important in determining priority.