How is a claim rejected as anticipated?
To reject a claim as anticipated, the prior art reference must disclose every element of the claimed invention. The MPEP 2131 states:
To reject a claim as anticipated by a reference, the disclosure must teach every element required by the claim under its broadest reasonable interpretation.
Furthermore, the Federal Circuit has clarified:
A claim is anticipated only if each and every element as set forth in the claim is found, either expressly or inherently described, in a single prior art reference.
(Verdegaal Bros. v. Union Oil Co. of California)
This means that all elements of the claim must be present in a single reference for it to be considered anticipatory.
To learn more:
Topics:
MPEP 2100 - Patentability,
MPEP 2131 - Anticipation — Application Of 35 U.S.C. 102,
Patent Law,
Patent Procedure