How does the USPTO handle conflicting affidavits or declarations in patent applications?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling conflicting affidavits or declarations in patent applications. According to MPEP 716:
‘Where the examiner has specific knowledge of the existence of a particular reference or references which indicate nonpatentability of the applicant’s claims, he or she may use his or her knowledge in rejecting the claims without citing the references.’
This means that if an examiner is aware of conflicting evidence, they can consider it even if it’s not explicitly cited. In cases of conflicting affidavits or declarations:
- The examiner must weigh the credibility and strength of each piece of evidence.
- They may request additional information or clarification from the applicant.
- The examiner can maintain a rejection if they believe the conflicting evidence outweighs the applicant’s submissions.
- In some cases, the examiner might suggest an interview to discuss and resolve conflicting information.
Ultimately, the examiner must make a judgment based on the totality of the evidence presented, considering factors such as the qualifications of the declarants, the factual basis of their statements, and the relevance to the specific claims at issue.
To learn more: