How does the level of skill in the art affect enablement in plant genetics prior art?
The level of skill in the art is a crucial factor in determining enablement in plant genetics prior art. According to MPEP 2121.03, “The fact that experimentation may be complex does not necessarily make it undue, if the art typically engages in such experimentation.” This statement underscores the importance of considering the typical practices and knowledge in the field of plant genetics when assessing enablement.
The level of skill in the art affects enablement in several ways:
- Interpretation of disclosures: A person with ordinary skill in the art (POSA) may be able to understand and apply information from prior art that might seem incomplete or unclear to someone with less expertise.
- Routine experimentation: What constitutes “undue experimentation” depends on what is considered routine in the field. As the MPEP notes, complex experimentation may not be undue if it’s typical in plant genetics.
- Bridging gaps in disclosure: A skilled practitioner may be able to fill in minor gaps in a prior art disclosure using their knowledge and experience, potentially rendering a seemingly non-enabling disclosure enabling.
When examining prior art for enablement in plant genetics, patent examiners must consider what a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand and be capable of at the time the prior art was published. This assessment helps determine whether the prior art provides sufficient information to enable the claimed invention without undue experimentation.
To learn more: