How does the grace period inventor-originated disclosure exception differ from other prior art exceptions?

The grace period inventor-originated disclosure exception under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(A) is a specific type of prior art exception with unique characteristics:

  1. Source of Disclosure: It applies to disclosures made by the inventor, a joint inventor, or someone who obtained the subject matter directly or indirectly from the inventor or joint inventor.
  2. Time Frame: It covers disclosures made one year or less before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
  3. Automatic Application: If apparent from the disclosure itself, this exception can be applied without additional evidence.
  4. Flexibility: It can be established through various means, including statements in the specification or affidavits/declarations.

The MPEP notes: “AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(A) provides exceptions to the prior art provisions of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). These exceptions limit the use of an inventor’s own work as prior art, when the inventor’s own work has been publicly disclosed by the inventor, a joint inventor, or another who obtained the subject matter directly or indirectly from the inventor or joint inventor not more than one year before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.

This exception is distinct from other prior art exceptions in its focus on inventor-originated disclosures within a specific time frame, providing a unique protection for inventors who disclose their work before filing a patent application.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability, MPEP 2153.01 - Prior Art Exception Under Aia 35 U.S.C. 102(B)(1)(A) To Aia 35 U.S.C. 102(A)(1) (Grace Period Inventor - Originated Disclosure Exception), Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: AIA, Comparative Analysis, grace period, Inventor Disclosure, prior art exception