How are potentially interfering patent applications assigned to examiners?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. According to MPEP 2304.01(b) , applications that are believed to interfere should typically be assigned to the same examiner. The section states: “Ordinarily applications that are believed to interfere should be assigned to the same examiner.” This practice ensures consistency in the examination process for potentially interfering applications. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Interfering Applications Must Be Assigned to Same Examiner MPEP 2304.01(b) Recommended Applications Must Be Assigned to Same TC MPEP 2304.01(b) Recommended Requirement for Complete Patent and Benefit Files MPEP 2304.01(b) IFW Files May Contain Unconverted Artifacts MPEP 2304.01(b) Permitted Complete Patent and Benefit Files Required for Determining Pre-AIA 102(g)(1) Benefit MPEP 2304.01(b) Recommended All Files Required for Interference Referral MPEP 2304.01(b) Prohibited File Wrapper Must Be Reconstructed Before Board Referral MPEP 2304.01(b) Required PCT Application Included in National Stage for Benefit MPEP 2304.01(b) Required PCT Application File Required for Benefit MPEP 2304.01(b) Required PCT Application File Required for Benefit Claim MPEP 2304.01(b) Required Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What happens when potentially interfering applications are in different Technology Centers? How are PCT application files handled in patent interferences? How does the USPTO handle paper files in the interference process? What is an interference search in patent examination? How does an adverse judgment affect patent claims in interference proceedings?