How does the written description requirement apply to amended or new claims?
The written description requirement applies not only to original claims but also to amended and new claims introduced during prosecution. The MPEP 2163.01 states: “The fundamental factual inquiry is whether the specification conveys with reasonable clarity to those skilled in the art that, as of the filing date sought, applicant was in possession of the…
Read MoreWhat is the written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. 112(a)?
The written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) mandates that the specification must describe the claimed invention in sufficient detail to demonstrate to a person skilled in the art that the inventor had possession of the claimed invention at the time of filing. According to MPEP 2166, a rejection based on the written description requirement…
Read MoreHow does the written description requirement apply to new or amended claims?
For new or amended claims, the applicant must show support in the original disclosure. The MPEP states: “With respect to newly added or amended claims, applicant should show support in the original disclosure for the new or amended claims.” The examiner has the initial burden of presenting evidence or reasoning why a person skilled in…
Read MoreWhat issues can arise with new or amended claims regarding written description?
New or amended claims can face written description issues if they introduce elements not supported by the original disclosure. The MPEP 2163.03 states: “To comply with the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, or to be entitled to an earlier priority date or filing date under 35…
Read MoreHow does the written description requirement apply to genus claims?
The written description requirement for genus claims is particularly important and often challenging. MPEP 2304.02(d) states: “For generic claims, the genus can be adequately described if the disclosure presents a sufficient number of representative species that encompass the genus. If the genus has substantial variance, the disclosure must describe a sufficient variety of species to…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle predictable versus unpredictable arts in written description evaluations?
How does the USPTO handle predictable versus unpredictable arts in written description evaluations? The USPTO’s approach to evaluating written descriptions differs between predictable and unpredictable arts. According to MPEP 2163.02: “The level of detail required to satisfy the written description requirement varies depending on the nature and scope of the claims and on the complexity…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a negative limitation has written description support?
How does the USPTO determine if a negative limitation has written description support? The USPTO examines negative limitations for written description support based on the guidance provided in MPEP 2173.05(i). The key factors include: Express disclosure in the specification Inherent disclosure based on what is described Original claims Drawings that show the absence of a…
Read MoreWhat are the typical circumstances where adequate written description issues arise in patent applications?
The MPEP 2163.03 outlines three typical circumstances where adequate written description issues arise: Original claims: When the claims define the invention in functional language specifying a desired result but the specification does not sufficiently describe how the function is performed or the result is achieved. New or amended claims: When the claims are not supported…
Read MoreWhat is a “threshold issue” in patent interference proceedings?
A threshold issue in patent interference proceedings is a critical concept defined in 37 CFR 41.201. The MPEP states: “Threshold issue means an issue that, if resolved in favor of the movant, would deprive the opponent of standing in the interference.” One important threshold issue specifically mentioned is: “Unpatentability for lack of written description under…
Read MoreWhat is the standard for determining compliance with the written description requirement?
The standard for determining compliance with the written description requirement is an objective one. As stated in MPEP 2163.02, the essential question is: “does the description clearly allow persons of ordinary skill in the art to recognize that he or she invented what is claimed.” This standard comes from the Federal Circuit case In re…
Read More