What are the written description and enablement requirements related to test results in patent applications?

The written description and enablement requirements are crucial when considering test results in patent applications. The MPEP 707.07(l) references these requirements: See MPEP §§ 2161 – 2164.08(c) for a discussion of the written description and enablement requirements of 35 U.S.C 112. These requirements, found in 35 U.S.C. 112(a), mandate that the patent application must: Written…

Read More

What happens if a prior-filed application lacks adequate written description for a claimed invention?

If a prior-filed application lacks adequate written description for a claimed invention, the following consequences may occur: The claim in the later-filed application will not be entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the prior-filed application for that invention. The effective filing date for the claimed invention will be the filing date of…

Read More

What happens if the prior-filed application is a provisional application?

What happens if the prior-filed application is a provisional application? When the prior-filed application is a provisional application, special considerations apply: The nonprovisional application must be filed within 12 months of the provisional application’s filing date (or 14 months with a petition for revival). The provisional application must have adequate written description and enablement support…

Read More

What is required for a later-filed application to be entitled to the benefit of an earlier-filed application’s filing date?

For a later-filed application to be entitled to the benefit of an earlier-filed application’s filing date, the following requirements must be met: The invention disclosed in the later-filed application must also be disclosed in the earlier-filed application. The disclosure in both applications must be sufficient to comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a), except…

Read More