How does the USPTO handle the classification of continuation and divisional applications?

The USPTO’s automated routing system takes into account the status of applications as continuations or divisionals when assigning them to examiners. According to MPEP 909.01(b): “Additional factors, such as […] the application’s status as a continuation or divisional application are weighted by the automated system prior to assignment of the application.” This consideration is important…

Read More

What factors does the USPTO’s automated routing system consider when assigning patent applications to examiners?

The USPTO’s automated routing system considers several factors when assigning patent applications to examiners, as described in MPEP 909.01(b). These factors include: CPC classifications of the application Examiner portfolios (classification areas assigned to the examiner) Size of an examiner’s docket Case backlogs within a particular classification area Application’s status as a continuation or divisional application…

Read More

Can the USPTO act on a reissue application before the two-month delay period expires?

Yes, the USPTO can act on a reissue application before the two-month delay period expires under certain circumstances. MPEP § 1441 states: For example, the Office may act on a continuation or a divisional reissue application before the expiration of the 2-month period after announcement. Additionally, the Office will entertain a petition under 37 CFR…

Read More

What authority does the Director of Technology Center 2900 have in design patent applications?

The Director of Technology Center 2900 has specific authority delegated for design patent applications, in addition to the general authorities given to all Technology Center Directors. Specifically, the Director of TC 2900 can decide on: Requests for expedited examination of design applications under 37 CFR 1.155, as outlined in MPEP § 1504.30. As stated in…

Read More

How does an application being “substantially allowable” affect its processing?

When an application is deemed “substantially allowable,” it receives special status and is processed more quickly. MPEP § 1301 states: “When an application is in condition for allowance, except as to matters of form, the application will be considered special and prompt action taken to require correction of formal matters.” This means that the USPTO…

Read More

How can the public submit information about a reissue application during the two-month delay period?

During the two-month delay period, members of the public can submit pertinent information about a reissue application to the USPTO. According to MPEP § 1441: The pertinent information is submitted in the form of a protest under 37 CFR 1.291(a). To submit a protest, follow the guidelines in MPEP § 1441.01, which specifically discusses protests…

Read More