How can an applicant demonstrate sufficient proprietary interest without an assignment or agreement to assign?

If an applicant in a pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.47(b) application doesn’t have an assignment or agreement to assign, they can demonstrate sufficient proprietary interest by: Submitting a legal memorandum Providing an affidavit or declaration of firsthand knowledge Including copies of relevant statutes or court decisions (if non-U.S.) MPEP 409.03(f) states: “A proprietary interest obtained other…

Read More

What is the difference between an assignment and an agreement to assign in the context of MPEP 409.03(f)?

MPEP 409.03(f) distinguishes between an assignment and an agreement to assign in the context of proving proprietary interest for pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.47(b) applications. The key differences are: Assignment: A completed transfer of rights in the invention. Agreement to Assign: A promise to transfer rights in the future, often conditional. For an assignment, MPEP 409.03(f)…

Read More

What is the significance of ‘facts showing the right’ in proving proprietary interest?

What is the significance of ‘facts showing the right’ in proving proprietary interest? The phrase ‘facts showing the right’ is crucial in proving proprietary interest for patent applications. According to MPEP 409.03(f): ‘Facts showing the right or authority to make the petition must be proved in accordance with 37 CFR 1.46.’ This means that: Applicants…

Read More

How are patent applications handled when all inventors are unavailable or unwilling to sign?

When all inventors are unavailable or unwilling to sign a patent application, there are still options for filing. According to MPEP § 409.03(b) (for applications filed before September 16, 2012) and MPEP § 409.05 (for applications filed on or after September 16, 2012): An assignee or obligated assignee may file the application as the applicant…

Read More