Can a licensee of exclusive right prosecute a patent application?
No, a licensee of exclusive right cannot prosecute a patent application. According to MPEP 106.01, only the assignee of record of the entire interest has the right to intervene in the prosecution of an application. The MPEP states: While it is only the assignee of record of the entire interest who can intervene in the…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between a nonprovisional and a provisional patent application?
While MPEP 203.03 specifically discusses amended nonprovisional applications, it’s important to understand the distinction between nonprovisional and provisional applications: Nonprovisional Application: This is a formal patent application that can result in an issued patent. It undergoes examination and can be amended, as described in MPEP 203.03. Provisional Application: This is a temporary application that establishes…
Read MoreHow are pro se applicants treated in patent applications?
How are pro se applicants treated in patent applications? Pro se applicants (individuals who file patent applications without the assistance of a registered patent attorney or agent) are treated with special consideration by the USPTO. The MPEP states: “While an inventor may prosecute the application, lack of skill in this field usually acts as a…
Read MoreIs a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) considered a new application?
No, a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) is not considered a new application. The MPEP 203.01 clarifies this point: Note that a request for continued examination (RCE)(see 37 CFR 1.114) is not a type of new application filing. An RCE is a way to continue prosecution of an existing application after a final rejection, rather…
Read MoreHow does the patent examination process work?
The patent examination process involves a back-and-forth between the examiner and the applicant. MPEP 203.03 describes a key part of this process: An ‘amended’ nonprovisional application is one that having been acted on by the examiner, has in turn been acted on by the applicant in reply to the examiner’s action. The general steps in…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for submitting an IDS after the first Office action?
What are the requirements for submitting an IDS after the first Office action? When submitting an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) after the first Office action on the merits, additional requirements apply: Timing: The IDS must be filed before the mailing date of a final action, notice of allowance, or other action that closes prosecution. Statement:…
Read MoreCan individuals with limited recognition file documents in patent applications?
Yes, individuals granted limited recognition can file certain documents in patent applications. According to the MPEP 402.01: Persons granted limited recognition are considered practitioners under 37 CFR 11.1 and thus permitted to perform the same patent prosecution functions of registered patent agents and registered patent attorneys when prosecuting a specified patent application or specified patent…
Read MoreWhen should an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) be filed in a patent application?
An Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) should be filed at different stages of patent application processing, depending on the circumstances: Within three months of the filing date or before the first Office action on the merits, whichever is later Before the mailing of a final Office action, Notice of Allowance, or an Ex parte Quayle action…
Read More