What role does 35 U.S.C. 112(b) play in determining the subject matter of an invention?
What role does 35 U.S.C. 112(b) play in determining the subject matter of an invention? 35 U.S.C. 112(b) plays a crucial role in determining the subject matter of an invention by requiring clarity and precision in patent claims. According to MPEP 2172: “35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph requires that the…
Read MoreWhat is a statutory disclaimer?
A statutory disclaimer is a statement filed by a patent owner in which they relinquish legal rights to one or more complete claims of an issued patent. This is typically done if the patent owner believes certain claims are too broad or invalid. As stated in the MPEP: A statutory disclaimer is a statement in…
Read MoreWhat is a broadened reissue claim?
A broadened reissue claim is a claim that enlarges the scope of the claims of the original patent. According to the MPEP, A broadened reissue claim is a claim which enlarges the scope of the claims of the patent, i.e., a claim which is greater in scope than each and every claim of the original…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO define “invention” for claim analysis?
The USPTO defines “invention” for claim analysis as follows: “The invention” is defined by the claims. The invention set forth in the claims must be presumed to be that which the applicant regards as his or her invention. This definition is found in MPEP 904.01. It emphasizes that the claims themselves define the invention, and…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle “election by original presentation”?
The USPTO handles “election by original presentation” when an applicant adds claims to a new invention after receiving an Office action on the original claims. The examiner will treat the newly added claims as if they were part of a separate application. Specifically: The examiner will issue a restriction requirement using form paragraph 8.04. The…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a reissue claim is broadening?
How does the USPTO determine if a reissue claim is broadening? The USPTO determines if a reissue claim is broadening by comparing it to the claims of the original patent. According to MPEP 1412.03: “A claim is broadened if it is broader in any respect than the original patent claims, even though it may be…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO define “independent inventions” for restriction purposes?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) defines independent inventions in the context of restriction requirements as outlined in MPEP 806. According to this section: “Independent inventions are inventions which are not connected in design, operation, or effect, e.g., species under a genus which are mutually exclusive.“ This means that independent inventions: Have no…
Read MoreWhat happens to claims drawn to nonelected inventions?
Claims found to be drawn to nonelected inventions, including claims drawn to nonelected species or inventions that may be eligible for rejoinder, are treated according to specific guidelines outlined in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP). As stated in MPEP § 821: “Claims found to be drawn to nonelected inventions, including claims drawn to…
Read MoreHow should patent applicants structure their claims to facilitate a thorough search?
Patent applicants can facilitate a thorough and complete search by structuring their claims appropriately. The MPEP 904.03 states: Applicants can facilitate a thorough and complete search by including, at the time of filing, claims varying from the broadest to which they believe they are entitled to the most detailed that they would be willing to…
Read MoreHow are species claims different from generic claims in patents?
Species claims in patents are different from generic claims in that they are more specific and limited to particular embodiments of an invention. The MPEP 806.04(e) clarifies: “Claims are definitions or descriptions of inventions. Claims themselves are never species. The scope of a claim may be limited to a single disclosed embodiment (i.e., a single…
Read More