What is the relationship between commercial success and patent nonobviousness?
Commercial success can be used as evidence of nonobviousness in patent applications. However, the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 716.03(b) states that “care should be taken to determine that the commercial success alleged is directly derived from the invention claimed.” This means that there must be a clear nexus between the claimed invention and…
Read MoreWhat is the nexus requirement for commercial success in patent applications?
The nexus requirement for commercial success in patent applications refers to the need for a factually and legally sufficient connection between the evidence of commercial success and the claimed invention. As stated in the MPEP, The term ‘nexus’ designates a factually and legally sufficient connection between the evidence of commercial success and the claimed invention…
Read MoreHow does commercial success relate to long-felt need in patent examination?
Commercial success can be a significant factor in supporting long-felt need during patent examination. The MPEP 716.04 provides insight into this relationship: “In considering evidence of commercial success, care should be taken to determine that the commercial success alleged is directly derived from the invention claimed, in a marketplace where the consumer is free to…
Read MoreHow does commercial success factor into long-felt need arguments for patents?
Commercial success can be a significant factor in supporting long-felt need arguments for patents. The MPEP 716.04 addresses this relationship: ‘Evidence of long-felt need may be shown by establishing a long-felt want or demand for a solution to a problem that has existed for a considerable length of time without solution by another.’ Commercial success…
Read MoreWhat is the requirement for commercial success evidence in patent applications?
Commercial success evidence must be commensurate in scope with the claims of the patent application. This means that the evidence of commercial success should be directly related to the claimed features of the invention, not unclaimed features. As stated in MPEP 716.03(a): “Objective evidence of nonobviousness including commercial success must be commensurate in scope with…
Read MoreWhat information can examiners request about the invention’s commercial success?
What information can examiners request about the invention’s commercial success? Patent examiners can request various types of information related to an invention’s commercial success. According to MPEP 704.11, this may include: ‘Information concerning the success of the invention, including licenses, sales, and advertising.’ Specifically, examiners might ask for: Sales figures for products embodying the claimed…
Read MoreHow is commercial success evidence evaluated in patent cases?
How is commercial success evidence evaluated in patent cases? Commercial success evidence in patent cases is evaluated based on several factors: Nexus: There must be a clear connection between the commercial success and the claimed invention. Market share: The extent of market penetration is considered. Sales figures: Substantial sales can indicate commercial success. Growth: Rapid…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements when the claimed invention is not coextensive with the commercial product?
When the claimed invention is not coextensive with the commercial product or process, the applicant must demonstrate a legally sufficient relationship between the claimed feature and the commercial success. This ensures that the commercial success is attributable to the specific aspects of the invention that are claimed. According to MPEP 716.03(a): “Where the commercially successful…
Read MoreHow should commercial success be demonstrated for inventions with claimed ranges?
For inventions with claimed ranges, it’s not necessary to demonstrate commercial success at every point within the range. Evidence of substantial commercial success at a typical point within the claimed range can be persuasive, especially if operation throughout the range is similar. The MPEP 716.03(a) cites a precedent: “Where, as here, the claims are directed…
Read MoreWho bears the burden of proof for establishing a nexus between commercial success and the claimed invention?
According to the MPEP, the burden of proof for establishing a nexus between commercial success and the claimed invention lies with the applicant. The Federal Circuit has stated: Consequently, the PTO must rely upon the applicant to provide hard evidence of commercial success. (MPEP 716.03) This means that applicants asserting commercial success to support nonobviousness…
Read More