How does a proper priority claim affect the prior art status of international applications?
A proper priority claim can significantly affect the prior art status of international applications. The MPEP 2127 provides guidance on this: “If the international application does not have an earlier effective date under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) based on a proper priority claim to an earlier filed U.S. application, the international application is only effective as…
Read MoreHow are pending U.S. patent applications treated in terms of confidentiality and prior art?
Pending U.S. patent applications are generally kept confidential, but there are important exceptions and considerations: Most pending applications are preserved in confidence as per 37 CFR 1.14(a). Exceptions include published applications, reissue applications, and applications where public inspection has been granted. Applications with common assignees or inventors may be used for certain rejections, even if…
Read MoreHow can foreign patent applications be considered “published” for prior art purposes?
Foreign patent applications can be considered “published” and used as prior art under certain conditions, even if they are not issued in printed form. The key factor is public accessibility. As explained in the MPEP: “When the specification is not issued in printed form but is announced in an official journal and anyone can inspect…
Read MoreHow are foreign patent applications treated as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(e)?
Foreign patent applications are not considered prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(e). The MPEP states: “Note that a foreign patent application publication, including WIPO publications of international applications, may have an earlier prior art date under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) than under 35 U.S.C. 102(e).” This means that while foreign patent applications can be used as…
Read MoreWhat is the effective prior art date for WIPO publications of international applications?
The effective prior art date for WIPO publications of international applications depends on the specific subsection of 35 U.S.C. 102 being applied. According to MPEP 2127: “A WIPO publication of an international application that designates but does not originate in the U.S. is effective as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as of the date…
Read MoreCan canceled matter from a patent application be used in a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection?
Canceled matter from a patent application cannot be used in a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection. The MPEP clearly states: “Canceled matter in the application file of a U.S. patent or application publication cannot be relied upon in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e).” Ex Parte…
Read MoreCan canceled figures from a foreign patent application be used as prior art?
Yes, canceled figures from a foreign patent application can be used as prior art under certain circumstances. The MPEP provides an important case example: “Figures that had been canceled from a Canadian patent application before issuance of the patent were available as prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as of the date the application…
Read MoreWhen can abandoned patent applications be used as prior art?
Abandoned patent applications can be used as prior art under specific circumstances: When they have been appropriately disclosed, such as being referenced in another patent’s disclosure, in a publication, or by voluntary disclosure. When they become publicly accessible. As stated in the MPEP: “An abandoned patent application may become evidence of prior art only when…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of the 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) date for U.S. patents claiming priority?
The 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) date is crucial for determining the prior art effect of U.S. patents claiming priority. This date can affect whether a patent or application can be used as prior art against another application. The MPEP provides guidance on this topic: “See MPEP § 2136.02 and MPEP § 2136.03 for the 35 U.S.C.…
Read More