What action does the USPTO take if the required documents for a non-English provisional application are missing?

When the required documents for a non-English provisional application are missing, the USPTO takes specific actions to notify the applicant. According to MPEP ¶ 2.38: “Use this form paragraph to notify applicant that an English translation of the non-English language provisional application and/or a statement that the translation is accurate is required.” The USPTO will…

Read More

What is the benefit of claiming priority to an international design application?

Claiming priority to an international design application can provide significant benefits for nonprovisional applications. According to MPEP § 211.01(d): Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 386(c), in accordance with the conditions and requirements of 35 U.S.C. 120, a nonprovisional application is entitled to the benefit of a prior international design application designating the United States. This means…

Read More

When can benefit be claimed under 35 U.S.C. 386(c) for international design applications?

The ability to claim benefit under 35 U.S.C. 386(c) for international design applications is subject to specific timing requirements. According to MPEP § 211.01(d): 37 CFR 1.78(j) provides that benefit under 35 U.S.C. 386(c) with respect to an international design application can only be claimed in nonprovisional applications, international applications, and international design applications filed…

Read More

Where can I find additional information on benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 386(c)?

For those seeking more detailed information on benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 386(c), the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) provides a specific reference. According to MPEP § 211.01(d): See MPEP § 2920.05(e) for additional information pertaining to benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 386(c). This section of the MPEP offers comprehensive guidance on the intricacies…

Read More

What are the requirements for an international design application to be entitled to a filing date?

For an international design application to be used as a basis for claiming benefit, it must meet specific filing date requirements. MPEP § 211.01(d) states: To obtain benefit of the filing date of a prior international design application designating the United States, the international design application must be entitled to a filing date in accordance…

Read More

What is the deadline for filing a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c)?

The deadline for filing a benefit claim depends on the type of application: For applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a), the reference must be submitted within the later of: Four months from the actual filing date of the application, or Sixteen months from the filing date of the prior application For nonprovisional applications entering the…

Read More

What information must be included in a benefit claim for continuations, divisionals, or continuation-in-part applications?

For benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c), which include continuations, divisionals, and continuation-in-part applications, the benefit claim must include specific information about the relationship between the applications. The MPEP states: “For benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c), the reference must include the relationship (i.e., continuation, divisional, or…

Read More

How does the benefit claim process differ for national stage applications under 35 U.S.C. 371?

The benefit claim process for national stage applications entering from an international application under 35 U.S.C. 371 has some specific timing requirements that differ from regular applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a). The MPEP states: “If the application is a nonprovisional application entering the national stage from an international application under 35 U.S.C. 371, the…

Read More