How does the MPEP define a “patent” for prior art purposes under 35 U.S.C. 102?
The MPEP 2126 provides a specific definition for what constitutes a “patent” in the context of prior art rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102. It states: “The term ‘patent’ as used in 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a), (b), and (d) includes utility models, inventor’s certificates, and similar patent rights issued by foreign countries.”…
Read MoreWhy should examiners consider pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) even if a reference is prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e)?
Examiners should consider pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) even if a reference is prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) for two main reasons: Earlier prior art date: The MPEP states, if the reference is a U.S. patent or patent application publication of, or claims benefit of, an international application, the publication of the international application…
Read MoreHow do examiners determine the effective filing date for 35 U.S.C. 102 rejections?
How do examiners determine the effective filing date for 35 U.S.C. 102 rejections? Examiners determine the effective filing date for 35 U.S.C. 102 rejections by considering several factors: The actual filing date of the patent application Any priority claims to earlier applications The filing date of the earliest application that supports the claimed invention According…
Read MoreWhat is the effect of a foreign patent’s term on its use as prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d)?
The term or expiration of a foreign patent can impact its use as prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d). According to MPEP 2126: “In re Monks, 588 F.2d 308, 200 USPQ 129 (CCPA 1978) interpreted the language ‘patented in a foreign country’ in pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d) to mean a patent which is enforceable.”…
Read MoreWhat are the exceptions to 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) rejections?
What are the exceptions to 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) rejections? There are several exceptions to 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) rejections, which are outlined in 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) and 102(b)(2). These exceptions include: Grace period disclosures: Disclosures made by the inventor or joint inventor within one year of the effective filing date. Derived disclosures:…
Read MoreHow does the effective filing date affect the application of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102?
The effective filing date of a claimed invention is crucial in determining whether to apply pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102. MPEP 2139.02 states: “If the application is subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102, examiners should continue to apply 35 U.S.C. 102(a), (b), or (e) in the alternative, indicating that either pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a), (b), or…
Read MoreWhat is the effective filing date and why is it important in patent law?
The effective filing date is a crucial concept in patent law that determines which version of the law applies to an application and what qualifies as prior art. The MPEP emphasizes its importance: In order to determine which paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 102 applies, the effective filing date of the application and each claimed invention…
Read MoreWhat are the key differences between pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a), (b), and (e)?
Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 subsections (a), (b), and (e) each define different types of prior art. According to MPEP 2139.02: 35 U.S.C. 102(a) covers knowledge or use by others in the U.S., or patents or printed publications anywhere, before the invention by the applicant. 35 U.S.C. 102(b) relates to public use or sale in the…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) rejections?
What is the difference between 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) rejections? The main differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) rejections are: 102(a)(1) applies to prior art that was publicly available before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. This includes patents, printed publications, public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public.…
Read MoreHow do I determine which version of 35 U.S.C. 102 applies to my patent application?
To determine which version of 35 U.S.C. 102 applies to your patent application, you need to consider the filing date of your application. The MPEP provides clear guidance: Form paragraph 7.03.aia or 7.03.fti should be used in an Office action to indicate whether the application is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions…
Read More