When can multiple references be used in a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection?

While normally only one reference should be used in a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection, multiple references can be used in specific circumstances. According to MPEP 2131.01, multiple references are proper when the extra references are cited to:

  • (A) Prove the primary reference contains an “enabled disclosure;”
  • (B) Explain the meaning of a term used in the primary reference; or
  • (C) Show that a characteristic not disclosed in the reference is inherent.

These circumstances allow for a more comprehensive analysis of the prior art while maintaining the integrity of the anticipation rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability, MPEP 2131.01 - Multiple Reference 35 U.S.C. 102 Rejections, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: 35 u.s.c. 102, Anticipation, Enabled Disclosure, Inherent Characteristics, Multiple References