When can multiple references be used in a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection?
While normally only one reference should be used in a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection, multiple references can be used in specific circumstances. According to MPEP 2131.01, multiple references are proper when the extra references are cited to: (A) Prove the primary reference contains an “enabled disclosure;” (B) Explain the meaning of a term used in…
Read MoreHow can extrinsic evidence be used to support a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection?
Extrinsic evidence can be used to support a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection in several ways, as outlined in MPEP 2131.01: To prove that a primary reference contains an “enabled disclosure.” To explain the meaning of a term used in the primary reference. To show that a characteristic not disclosed in the reference is inherent. The…
Read MoreWhat is an “enabled disclosure” in the context of 35 U.S.C. 102 rejections?
An “enabled disclosure” in the context of 35 U.S.C. 102 rejections refers to a prior art reference that not only discloses the claimed invention but also provides sufficient information to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention without undue experimentation. According to MPEP 2131.01, when a primary reference identically…
Read More