How are computer-implemented functional claim limitations interpreted in patent examination?
Computer-implemented functional claim limitations are interpreted broadly in patent examination. According to MPEP 2114:
“Functional claim language that is not limited to a specific structure covers all devices that are capable of performing the recited function.”
This means that if a prior art device can inherently perform the claimed function, it may be grounds for rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103. However, it’s important to note that computer-implemented functional limitations can also narrow the scope of the claim by limiting the specific structure capable of performing the function.
The term “computer” is generally interpreted broadly unless modified by other claim terms or clearly defined in the specification. Examiners should also consider that broadly claiming an automated means to replace a manual function may not distinguish over prior art.
To learn more: