Where should I send a petition to restore the benefit of a provisional application?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-09 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. According to the MPEP , a petition to restore the benefit of a provisional application should be addressed to: “Mail Stop Petition, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450.” It’s important to note that this petition must be filed in the subsequent nonprovisional application or international application designating the United States, not in the provisional application itself. Always ensure you’re following the most current USPTO guidelines for petition submissions, as procedures may be updated over time. For more information on patent procedure, visit: patent procedure . For more information on provisional application, visit: provisional application . Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Amendment Required for Earlier Filing Date Benefit MPEP 211 Required Petition for Nonprovisional Application Benefit Claim MPEP 211 Required Examiner Must Use Actual Filing Date for Rejection MPEP 211 Required Claiming Benefit of Prior Applications MPEP 211 Permitted Procedural Requirements for Filing Date Claim Under 35 U.S.C. 120, 119(e), etc. MPEP 211 Required Identification of Application by Number Required for Reference MPEP 211 Required Requirement for No Later Filing Date Claim MPEP 211 Petition to Restore Provisional Application Benefit Not Subjected To Specific Reference Requirement MPEP 211 Later-Filed Application Must Reference Prior Filing MPEP 211 Required Unintentional Delay Statement Required for Benefit Claim MPEP 211 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What is the &#8216;specific reference&#8217; requirement for claiming benefit of a prior-filed application? What is the &#8216;same invention&#8217; requirement for claimi...