When is a petition to expunge necessary for USPTO assignment errors?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-09 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. A petition to expunge is necessary when there has been a complete error in recording an assignment document at the USPTO. This typically occurs when a document not intended for recording was erroneously recorded. As stated in MPEP 323 : ‘In the case of a complete error (e.g., a wrong document is recorded), a petition to expunge the assignment record should be filed.’ Key points about petitions to expunge: They are used for complete errors, not minor corrections The petition should clearly explain the nature of the error Supporting documentation may be required The USPTO will review the petition and make a determination It’s important to note that expungement is a serious step and should only be used when absolutely necessary. For more information on USPTO, visit: USPTO . Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Recorded Assignment Documents Cannot Be Expunged Even If Invalid MPEP 323 Recording Fee Required for Corrective Documents MPEP 323 Required Assignment Documents Cannot Be Removed Once Recorded MPEP 323 Corrective Document Must Identify Error Location MPEP 323 Required Corrective Document Must Be Recorded With New Reel and Frame Number MPEP 323 Corrections for Mergers and Name Changes MPEP 323 Permitted Requirement for Submitting Corrective Document to Amend Recorded Assignment MPEP 323 Required New Recordation Form Cover Sheet Required for Corrections MPEP 323 Original Cover Sheet Required for Corrective Document MPEP 323 Recommended Recorded Assignments Not Expunged Even If Invalid MPEP 323 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse Can assignment records be expunged from the USPTO database? What happens if there&#8217;s a typographical error in the recor...