What types of interview requests are likely to be denied after final rejection?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Certain types of interview requests are likely to be denied after final rejection. The MPEP 713.09 specifies: Interviews merely to restate arguments of record or to discuss new limitations which would require more than nominal reconsideration or new search should be denied. This means that interviews aimed at rehashing previous arguments or introducing significant new limitations that would require substantial additional examination are unlikely to be granted. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Interviews to Discuss New Limitations Should Be Denied MPEP 713.09 Recommended Positions Presented During Interviews Should Be Advanced with Decorum and Courtesy MPEP 713 Recommended Interview Records Must Be Made of Record MPEP 713 Summary of Interview Where No Electronic Record Exists MPEP 713 Required Interviews Required After Notice of Appeal MPEP 713.09 Permitted Interview to Resolve Issues Before Appeal MPEP 713.09 Recommended Interview Permitted for Clarification Before Appeal MPEP 713.09 Permitted Interviews Permitted After Shortened Period Before Maximum MPEP 713.09 Permitted Interview Permitted for Expedited Appeal MPEP 713.09 Permitted Interviews to Advance Patent Prosecution MPEP 713 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse Can multiple interviews be conducted after a final rejection? When can an interview be conducted after a final rejection? What should be done before requesting an interview after final rejection? What is the time frame for conducting interviews after final rejection? What criteria does an examiner use to grant an interview after final rejection?