What is the policy on video conference interviews in patent examination?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The USPTO encourages the use of video conferencing tools for patent examination interviews. According to MPEP 713.01 : ‘Video conference tools can be used to conduct interviews with applicants or their representatives.’ Video conferences offer several advantages: Increased flexibility in scheduling Reduced travel costs for applicants Enhanced communication through visual cues Ability to share screens and documents in real-time Examiners and applicants should follow the same preparation and documentation procedures for video interviews as they would for in-person or telephone interviews. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Requirement for Video Conferencing Interviews MPEP 713.01 Recommended Oral Authorization for Video Conferencing Interviews MPEP 713.01 Oral Authorization for Video Conferencing Interviews MPEP 713.01 Recommended Authorization Required for Video Conferencing Interviews MPEP 713.01 Recommended Examiners Must Grant Video Conference Interviews Normally MPEP 713.01 Recommended Examiners Must Host Video Conferences for Interviews MPEP 713.01 Prohibited Examiners May Conduct Interviews Via Video, Phone, or In Person MPEP 713.01 Permitted Examiners Must Offer Video Conferencing Interviews When Appropriate MPEP 713.01 Recommended Examiner Must Coordinate Video Conferences Using USPTO Tools MPEP 713.01 Recommended Video Conferencing Interviews Must Be Offered MPEP 713.01 Recommended Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What should be discussed in a patent examination interview? How should patent examiners prepare for interviews? Can patent examiners conduct interviews at any time during prosecution? How should patent examiners handle new issues...