What is the geographical limitation of “in this country” in pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

The MPEP clearly states that “The knowledge or use relied on in a pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) rejection must be knowledge or use ‘in this country.’” This means that prior knowledge or use outside the United States, even if widespread in a foreign country, cannot be used as a basis for rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a).

The MPEP cites the case of In re Ekenstam to support this interpretation. It’s important to note that despite changes made to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 104 by NAFTA and the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, the phrase “in this country” in pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) still refers only to the United States and does not include other WTO or NAFTA member countries.

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability MPEP 2132 - Pre - Aia 35 U.S.C. 102(A) Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Aia No By Others, Aia Public Use, Pre Aia 102a, Preaia 102a, Prior Art Aia