What is the general rule regarding entering amendments in part?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The general rule is that an amendment should not be entered in part to avoid confusion of the record. As stated in MPEP 714.20 : “To avoid confusion of the record the general rule prevails that an amendment should not be entered in part.” However, there are exceptions to this rule when strict adherence might cause more harm than good, especially if the amendment is received near the end of the reply period. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Each Section of an Amendment Must Begin on a Separate Sheet MPEP 714 Required Amendments In Reissue Must Follow §1.173 MPEP 714 Required Examiner’s Amendment After Reply Period MPEP 714 Permitted Two-Month Reply Period for Non-Final Amendment MPEP 714 Two-Month Reply Period for Supplemental Amendments During Suspension MPEP 714 Two-Month Reply Period for Non-Compliant Amendments MPEP 714 Manner of Making Amendments in Application MPEP 714 Amendments in Ex Parte Reexamination MPEP 714 Amendment of Claims Near Reply Deadline MPEP 714.20 Recommended Amendment Only Entered to Extent Motion Granted MPEP 714.20 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse How are substitute specifications handled in current USPTO practice? How are amendments handled in applications with closed prosecution on the merits? How does the USPTO handle amendments accompanying partially granted motions? How are amendments under 37 CFR 1.312 handled if partially approved? How are unacceptable substitute specifications handled in amendments?