What is the difference between an assignment and a 37 CFR 3.73(c) statement?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-09
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
An assignment and a 37 CFR 3.73(c) statement serve different purposes in the patent application process:
- Assignment: This is the actual transfer of ownership rights from the inventor(s) to the assignee.
- 37 CFR 3.73(c) statement: This is a document filed with the USPTO to establish the assignee’s right to take action in a patent application.
As stated in MPEP 325: “The submission of the statement pursuant to 37 CFR 3.73(c) is not required if a 37 CFR 3.73(b) statement has been previously filed in the application or patent prior to September 16, 2012.” This highlights that the 3.73(c) statement is a procedural document for USPTO purposes, while the assignment is the substantive transfer of rights.
For more information on USPTO procedures, visit: USPTO procedures.
Topics:
MPEP 300 - Ownership and Assignment
Patent Law
Patent Procedure