What is the burden of proof in rebutting a prima facie case of obviousness?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
According to MPEP 2145, if a prima facie case of obviousness is established, the burden shifts to the applicant to come forward with arguments and/or evidence to rebut the prima facie case. As stated in the MPEP:
This means the applicant must present persuasive arguments or evidence to overcome the examiner’s rejection. However, the ultimate burden of persuasion remains with the examiner to prove obviousness.
Topics:
MPEP 2100 - Patentability
MPEP 2145 - Consideration Of Applicant'S Rebuttal Arguments And Evidence
Patent Law
Patent Procedure