What is the burden of proof in product-by-process claim rejections?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

In product-by-process claim rejections, the burden of proof is initially on the patent examiner, but it’s lower than for conventional product claims. According to MPEP 2113:

“The Patent Office bears a lesser burden of proof in making out a case of prima facie obviousness for product-by-process claims because of their peculiar nature” than when a product is claimed in the conventional fashion.

Once the examiner provides a rationale showing that the claimed product appears to be the same or similar to a prior art product, the burden shifts to the applicant. The applicant must then provide evidence establishing a nonobvious difference between the claimed product and the prior art product.

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability MPEP 2113 - Product - By - Process Claims Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Anticipation, Contested Case Jurisdiction, Product-By-Process