What happens if a claim lacks written description support?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

If a claim lacks written description support, it can lead to significant consequences in the patent examination process. The MPEP 2163.01 states:

“If the examiner concludes that the claimed subject matter is not supported [described] in an application as filed, this would result in a rejection of the claim on the ground of a lack of written description under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, or denial of the benefit of the filing date of a previously filed application.”

This means that the examiner may reject the claim or deny the priority date, which can potentially affect the patentability of the invention.

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability MPEP 2163.01 - Support For The Claimed Subject Matter In Disclosure Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Aia Practice, Claims Optional, Genus-Species Claims, method claims, Sequence Format