What are the key differences between a CPA and a regular continuation application?

Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) have several key differences from regular continuation applications filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b):

• CPAs are only available for design applications, not utility or plant applications
• CPAs use the same application number as the prior application
• CPAs do not require a new specification or drawings to be filed
• The filing requirements for a CPA are minimal compared to a regular continuation
• CPAs are typically processed faster than regular continuations
• Filing a CPA automatically abandons the prior application

MPEP 201.06(d) states: A CPA has a number of advantages compared to a continuation or divisional application filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b). For example, the papers required to be filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in order to secure a filing date under 37 CFR 1.53(d) are minimal compared to 37 CFR 1.53(b).

For more information on design patents, visit: design patents.

For more information on patent application types, visit: patent application types.

For more information on USPTO procedures, visit: USPTO procedures.