What are common scenarios where citations may be too lengthy for the PTO-892 form?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The most common scenario where citations may be too lengthy for the PTO-892 form is with URLs (Uniform Resource Locators). As stated in MPEP 707.05(f) : “This scenario occurs commonly with URLs.” URLs can often be very long, especially for specific web pages or documents, making them difficult to fit within a single box on the PTO-892 form. In such cases, examiners need to follow the proper procedure for continuing the citation into the next box. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse URL Citation Continuation Requirement MPEP 707.05(f) Examiner Must Continue Long Citations MPEP 707.05(f) Permitted Examiner Must Thoroughly Study and Investigate Patent Applications MPEP 707 Required Examiner Must Thoroughly Study and Investigate Prior Art During Reexamination MPEP 707 Required Comprehensive Examination Required for Patentability and Compliance MPEP 707 Required International-Type Search Required for National Applications Filed After June 1, 1978 MPEP 707 Required Request for International-Type Search Report at National Examination MPEP 707 Permitted No Formal Search Report Required for Fee Refund in Later Filed International Application MPEP 707 Required Complete Examiner Action Required Except for Specific Issues MPEP 707 Examiner’s Action Limited to Specific Matters MPEP 707 Permitted Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What should patent attorneys look for when reviewing PTO-892 forms with lengthy citations? How are continued citations captured on the PTO-892 form? How should examiners handle lengthy citations on the PTO-892 form? What is the significance of 35 U.S.C. 301 in citing prior art? How should examiners address asserted advantages claimed by ...