Can a terminal disclaimer overcome a pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection?
No, a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection. This is explicitly stated in the MPEP: “Note that a terminal disclaimer does not overcome a pre‑AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection. See, e.g., In re Bartfeld, 925 F.2d 1450, 17 USPQ2d 1885 (Fed. Cir. 1991).” A terminal disclaimer is typically used to overcome…
Read MoreHow does a terminal disclaimer affect patent term adjustment eligibility?
A terminal disclaimer can significantly affect patent term adjustment eligibility. According to MPEP 2751: “Patents subject to a terminal disclaimer are not eligible for patent term adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154(b).“ This means that if a patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer, it is not eligible for any patent term adjustment, regardless of any…
Read MoreHow does a terminal disclaimer affect patent term adjustment?
A terminal disclaimer can limit the effect of patent term adjustment (PTA). According to MPEP 2731: “37 CFR 1.703(g) indicates that no patent, the term of which has been disclaimed beyond a specified date, shall be adjusted under 37 CFR 1.702 and 1.703 beyond the expiration date specified in the disclaimer (35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(B)).“ This…
Read MoreHow does a terminal disclaimer affect maintenance fee payments?
A terminal disclaimer can affect the term of a patent, but it does not change the maintenance fee payment requirements. According to MPEP 2520: “The term of a patent might be shortened, e.g., by a terminal disclaimer. If a patent will expire part way between the due dates set in 35 U.S.C. 41(b), or between…
Read MoreWhat is a “tentative abstract idea” in patent law?
A “tentative abstract idea” is a rare circumstance in patent examination where an examiner believes a claim limitation should be treated as an abstract idea, even though it doesn’t fall within the usual groupings of abstract ideas (mathematical concepts, certain methods of organizing human activity, mental processes). The MPEP states: There may be rare circumstances…
Read MoreWhat is the procedure for identifying a ‘tentative abstract idea’?
The MPEP describes a procedure for identifying a ‘tentative abstract idea’ in rare circumstances where an examiner believes a claim limitation should be treated as an abstract idea, but it doesn’t fall within the established groupings. The process is as follows: The examiner evaluates the claim under the subject matter eligibility framework. If the claim…
Read MoreCan a temporarily displayed reference be considered a printed publication in patent law?
Can a temporarily displayed reference be considered a printed publication in patent law? Yes, a temporarily displayed reference can be considered a printed publication under certain circumstances. The MPEP 2152.02(b) provides guidance on this: “Even if access to the information is limited to a few people, a printed publication may be established if those few…
Read MoreCan a temporarily available document be considered a printed publication?
Yes, a temporarily available document can be considered a printed publication under certain circumstances. The MPEP 2128 provides guidance on this matter: “A reference is considered publicly accessible even if it was available only for a short time or to a limited number of people, if the interested public could have accessed the document through…
Read MoreHow does the predictability of a technology affect enablement requirements?
The predictability of a technology significantly affects enablement requirements in patent law. Generally, less predictable technologies require more detailed disclosure to satisfy the enablement requirement. The MPEP Section 2164.06(b) provides examples illustrating this principle: In the Enzo Biochem v. Calgene case, the court noted that “antisense gene technology was highly unpredictable.” This unpredictability contributed to…
Read MoreHow does the complexity of technology affect enablement requirements in patents?
The complexity of technology significantly impacts enablement requirements in patent applications. MPEP 2164.05(b) addresses this issue: “The state of the prior art and the predictability of the art are inherently intertwined and are often evaluated together.” The complexity of technology affects enablement requirements in several ways: Disclosure Detail: More complex technologies typically require more detailed…
Read More