How does the USPTO determine if a claim is broader than the enabling disclosure?
The USPTO determines if a claim is broader than the enabling disclosure by considering two main factors: How broad the claim is with respect to the disclosure Whether one skilled in the art could make and use the entire scope of the claimed invention without undue experimentation According to the MPEP, The propriety of a…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a claim is too broad?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) uses several criteria to determine if a claim is too broad. According to MPEP 2173.04, the assessment depends on the specific issues with the claim: Inventor’s Regard: If the claim is broader than what the inventor regards as the invention, it may be rejected under 35 U.S.C.…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a biological material is known and readily available?
The USPTO determines if a biological material is known and readily available based on several factors: Public availability of the material Ability to reproduce the material from the written description Accessibility without undue experimentation MPEP 2404 states: “The USPTO will accept commercial availability as evidence that a biological material is known and readily available only…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO explain the basis for each determination in supplemental examination?
The USPTO explains the basis for each determination in supplemental examination by providing a clear rationale for the findings. According to MPEP 2816.03: “The determination should explain the basis for the determination of each issue with respect to each item of information. For example, the determination should explain why each item of information does or…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if an art is predictable or unpredictable?
The USPTO determines whether an art is predictable or unpredictable based on the ability of a skilled artisan to anticipate the effects of changes within the subject matter. According to MPEP 2164.03: “If one skilled in the art can readily anticipate the effect of a change within the subject matter to which the claimed invention…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a claim recites an abstract idea?
The USPTO uses a two-step process to determine if a claim recites an abstract idea: Evaluate the claim language: Examiners analyze the claim to identify any concepts that may be abstract ideas. Compare to established abstract idea categories: The identified concepts are compared to the enumerated groupings of abstract ideas and previous court decisions. According…
Read MoreWhere can I find information about derivation proceedings at the USPTO?
The MPEP 2314 provides guidance on where to find information about derivation proceedings at the USPTO. It states: “For further information, see 37 CFR part 42, subpart E; see also the Board’s Patent Trial Practice Guide available at www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/appealing-patent-decisions/resources/board-trial-rules-and-practice.” To learn more about derivation proceedings, you should consult: The Code of Federal Regulations (37 CFR…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine whether to institute a derivation proceeding?
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) follows specific criteria to determine whether to institute a derivation proceeding. According to MPEP 2310: “The petition, and any supplemental information filed, will be reviewed to determine whether they set forth a basis for instituting a derivation proceeding.“ The USPTO considers several factors, including: Whether the petition is…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO define “undue experimentation” in patent applications?
The USPTO defines “undue experimentation” in patent applications based on the principle that enablement is not precluded by the necessity for some experimentation. According to MPEP 2164.06: The test is not merely quantitative, since a considerable amount of experimentation is permissible, if it is merely routine, or if the specification in question provides a reasonable…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO define a “process” for patent eligibility?
How does the USPTO define a “process” for patent eligibility? According to MPEP 2106.03, a “process” for patent eligibility is defined as follows: “A process defines ‘actions’, i.e., an invention that is claimed as an act or step, or a series of acts or steps.“ The MPEP further clarifies that a process is not limited…
Read More