How does the USPTO determine if an SNQ exists for patent reexamination?
The USPTO determines if a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) exists for patent reexamination through a careful evaluation process. According to MPEP 2242: “If a reexamination request relies on references already considered by the Office, the request must demonstrate that a substantial new question of patentability is raised by the art, when the art…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine the inventor’s field of endeavor in patent applications?
The USPTO determines the inventor’s field of endeavor by examining the content of the patent application, particularly the specification. According to MPEP 2141.01(a): “The examiner must determine what is ‘analogous prior art’ for the purpose of analyzing the obviousness of the subject matter at issue. ‘The determination of what is analogous prior art is fact…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a disclosure is by the inventor or a joint inventor?
The USPTO determines if a disclosure is by the inventor or a joint inventor by examining the evidence provided and the circumstances of the disclosure. According to MPEP 2155.02: “The Office is not required to evaluate the sufficiency of the declaration or affidavit beyond ensuring that the declaration or affidavit addresses the subject matter of…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if claim language is definite?
The USPTO determines if claim language is definite by applying the following principles: Claims are reviewed from the perspective of one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing. Definiteness is evaluated in light of the content of the application disclosure, prior art of record, and claim interpretation that may be provided…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a claim falls within a statutory category?
The USPTO determines if a claim falls within a statutory category through Step 1 of the eligibility analysis. As described in MPEP § 2106, Step 1 asks: Is the claim to a process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter? The MPEP provides guidance on this process: The claim should be evaluated using its broadest reasonable…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a person is “skilled in the art” for the purpose of enabling disclosure?
The USPTO determines if a person is “skilled in the art” by considering the typical level of expertise in the specific technological field of the invention. This standard is used to assess whether the patent specification provides enough information for such a person to understand and implement the invention. According to MPEP 2164.05(b), “The relative…
Read MoreWhat is the scope of the USPTO’s determination in a supplemental examination?
The MPEP 2815 outlines the scope of the USPTO’s determination in a supplemental examination: “The determination will generally be limited to a review of the item(s) of information identified in the request as applied to the identified claim(s) of the patent. The determination will be based on the claims in effect at the time of…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a Sequence Listing XML is “non-lengthy”?
The USPTO determines if a Sequence Listing XML is “non-lengthy” based on the size of the ASCII text file produced after transforming the XML file. According to MPEP 2419.01: “Upon transformation of the .xml file using the style sheet to an ASCII text file, any ASCII text file produced by the USPTO that is under…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a negative limitation has written description support?
How does the USPTO determine if a negative limitation has written description support? The USPTO examines negative limitations for written description support based on the guidance provided in MPEP 2173.05(i). The key factors include: Express disclosure in the specification Inherent disclosure based on what is described Original claims Drawings that show the absence of a…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a claim is directed to a law of nature or natural phenomenon?
The USPTO uses a two-step analysis to determine if a claim is directed to a law of nature or natural phenomenon. This process is outlined in MPEP Section 2106.04(b): Step 2A, Prong One: Examiners evaluate whether the claim recites a law of nature or natural phenomenon. Step 2A, Prong Two: If the claim recites an…
Read More