How does the USPTO handle potential material fraud cases?
The USPTO does not have a dedicated unit for investigating material fraud. The process for handling potential material fraud cases is as follows: An employee (e.g., CRU examiner) becomes aware of potential material fraud. The employee notifies their supervisory official (e.g., CRU Director). If the supervisory official concurs, they refer the matter to the Deputy…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle protests involving fraud or inequitable conduct?
The USPTO has a specific approach to handling protests involving fraud or inequitable conduct. According to the MPEP, “This includes, of course, information indicating the presence of ‘fraud’ or ‘inequitable conduct’ or ‘violation of the duty of disclosure,’ which will be entered in the application file, generally without comment on the inequitable conduct issues raised…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle patent applications with missing essential information?
The USPTO handles patent applications with missing essential information by typically rejecting them under the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112(a). If crucial information is missing, the application may not enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention without undue experimentation. MPEP 2164.06(a) provides guidance on this issue: “A disclosure…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle partial changes in ownership recorded in the International Register?
The USPTO has specific rules regarding partial changes in ownership recorded in the International Register. According to MPEP 2930 and 37 CFR 1.1065(b): “A recording of a partial change in ownership in the International Register pursuant to Rule 21(7) concerning a transfer of less than all designs shall not have effect in the United States.”…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle prior art submissions in languages other than English for reexamination?
When submitting prior art in languages other than English for reexamination, the USPTO has specific requirements. According to MPEP 2244: “If the prior art patents and printed publications are in a language other than English, any necessary translation should be included.“ This means that: Translations must be provided for non-English prior art The translation should…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle prior art references from non-analogous arts in patent examinations?
The USPTO considers prior art references from non-analogous arts in patent examinations, particularly for obviousness rejections. According to MPEP 2141.01(a): “A reference is analogous art to the claimed invention if: (1) the reference is from the same field of endeavor as the claimed invention (even if it addresses a different problem); or (2) the reference…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle multiple reexamination requests for the same patent?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling multiple reexamination requests for the same patent. The MPEP provides guidance on this situation: “If a second or subsequent request for reexamination is filed (by any party permitted to do so) while a first reexamination is pending, the presence of a substantial new question of patentability depends on…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle multiple pending reexamination proceedings for the same patent?
The MPEP 2254 provides guidance on handling multiple pending reexamination proceedings for the same patent: Multiple ex parte reexamination proceedings are generally merged into a single proceeding. If an inter partes reexamination is also pending, it takes precedence over ex parte reexaminations. The USPTO may suspend one proceeding in favor of another to promote efficiency.…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle multiple protests against the same patent application?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling multiple protests against the same patent application. According to MPEP 1901: “If a second or subsequent protest by the same party to the same application is filed, it should not be entered even though it may contain new art, or a new argument or new evidence. The USPTO…
Read MoreHow are multiple post-patent proceedings handled by the USPTO?
When multiple post-patent proceedings are filed simultaneously, the USPTO handles them on a case-by-case basis. According to MPEP 2821: “If multiple post-patent proceedings are simultaneously filed, any determination of which proceedings to initiate, and the order in which to initiate them, will be made on a case-by-case basis.“ This approach allows the Office to consider…
Read More