How does the USPTO handle claims directed to a single means?
The USPTO treats claims directed to a single means with special consideration due to their potential lack of enablement. According to MPEP 2164.06(c): “A single means claim, i.e., where a means recitation does not appear in combination with another recited element of means, is subject to an enablement rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle protests in patent applications?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling protests in patent applications. According to MPEP 1901: Where the protest specifically identifies the application, and is otherwise compliant, the protest will be considered by the Office if it is matched with the application in time to permit review by the examiner during prosecution. However, if there’s insufficient…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle protected or secret information in protests?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling protected or secret information submitted with protests. According to the MPEP: “Information which is subject to a court-imposed protective or secrecy order may be submitted with, or as a part of, a protest under 37 CFR 1.291. Trade secret information which was obtained by a protestor through agreements…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle prior art references with predicted properties or prophetic examples?
The USPTO treats prior art references with predicted properties or prophetic examples as potentially valid prior art. According to MPEP 2121.04: “A reference that contains a detailed description of a specific embodiment, even if the embodiment has not been prepared or tested, may be sufficient to anticipate or render obvious a claimed invention.” This means…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle prior art that was previously considered during the original examination?
The USPTO has specific guidelines for handling prior art in ex parte reexamination that was previously considered during the original examination. According to MPEP 2244: “If prior art patents or printed publications are presented by the reexamination requester for review in a reexamination proceeding, and the requester has not had the patents or printed publications…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle potential material fraud cases?
The USPTO does not have a dedicated unit for investigating material fraud. The process for handling potential material fraud cases is as follows: An employee (e.g., CRU examiner) becomes aware of potential material fraud. The employee notifies their supervisory official (e.g., CRU Director). If the supervisory official concurs, they refer the matter to the Deputy…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle protests involving fraud or inequitable conduct?
The USPTO has a specific approach to handling protests involving fraud or inequitable conduct. According to the MPEP, “This includes, of course, information indicating the presence of ‘fraud’ or ‘inequitable conduct’ or ‘violation of the duty of disclosure,’ which will be entered in the application file, generally without comment on the inequitable conduct issues raised…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle patent applications with missing essential information?
The USPTO handles patent applications with missing essential information by typically rejecting them under the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112(a). If crucial information is missing, the application may not enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention without undue experimentation. MPEP 2164.06(a) provides guidance on this issue: “A disclosure…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle partial changes in ownership recorded in the International Register?
The USPTO has specific rules regarding partial changes in ownership recorded in the International Register. According to MPEP 2930 and 37 CFR 1.1065(b): “A recording of a partial change in ownership in the International Register pursuant to Rule 21(7) concerning a transfer of less than all designs shall not have effect in the United States.”…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle prior art submissions in languages other than English for reexamination?
When submitting prior art in languages other than English for reexamination, the USPTO has specific requirements. According to MPEP 2244: “If the prior art patents and printed publications are in a language other than English, any necessary translation should be included.“ This means that: Translations must be provided for non-English prior art The translation should…
Read More