How does the USPTO process Sequence Listing XML files?
The USPTO uses the Sequence Listing Information Control (SLIC) system to process “Sequence Listing XML” files. As stated in MPEP 2419: “At the USPTO, the Sequence Listing Information Control (SLIC) system will be responsible for processing of a ‘Sequence Listing XML’ and exporting the sequence data for publication and grant.” This system ensures that the…
Read MoreWhat are the size limits for Sequence Listing submissions via the USPTO patent electronic filing system?
The USPTO has established size limits for Sequence Listing submissions via their patent electronic filing system: The maximum file size for Sequence Listing and CRF text files is 100 megabytes. Files submitted electronically cannot be compressed. If a Sequence Listing or CRF text file exceeds 100 megabytes, it must be filed on read-only optical disc(s).…
Read MoreWhen does the USPTO review priority claims in international design applications?
The USPTO’s approach to reviewing priority claims in international design applications is specific and conditional: The USPTO does not automatically review priority claims during national stage examination. Priority claims are only reviewed if they become relevant to the examination process. Relevance may arise if prior art falls within the priority period or if there are…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO ensure public access to deposited biological materials?
The USPTO ensures public access to deposited biological materials through specific requirements outlined in MPEP 2410.01. These include: Requiring that all restrictions on access be irrevocably removed upon patent grant. Ensuring the deposit is made in a recognized facility. Mandating that the deposit be available to the public upon patent issuance. The MPEP states: “All…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of correspondence between the USPTO and regulatory agencies in patent term extension?
The correspondence between the USPTO and regulatory agencies serves multiple purposes in the patent term extension process: To facilitate eligibility decisions for patent term extension To allow both entities to carry out their responsibilities under 35 U.S.C. 156 To exchange information regarding regulatory review period determinations, due diligence petitions, and informal regulatory agency hearings As…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle refunds for duplicate maintenance fee payments?
The USPTO has a specific process for handling refunds of duplicate maintenance fee payments. According to MPEP 2532: “If the first payment was properly processed, the Office will return the duplicate payment to the second fee submitter. In this event the returned payment will be accompanied by identification of the first fee submitter.“ This means…
Read MoreHow should USPTO personnel report time spent on reexamination activities?
According to the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) Section 2638, all USPTO personnel are required to report all time spent on reexamination activities accurately. The MPEP states: “It is essential that all time expended on reexamination activities be reported accurately. Thus, all USPTO personnel should report all time spent on reexamination on their individual…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle a request for reexamination of a patent that has already been reissued?
The USPTO has a specific policy for handling reexamination requests for patents that have already been reissued. The MPEP states: “Where a request for reexamination is filed on a patent after a reissue patent for that patent has already issued, reexamination will be denied, because the patent on which the request for reexamination is based…
Read MoreHow are reexamination request papers initially processed by the USPTO?
The initial processing of reexamination request papers at the USPTO involves several steps: Receipt and Scanning: The papers are received in the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) and scanned into the Image File Wrapper (IFW) system. Assignment to CRU or TC: The request is then forwarded to either the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) or…
Read MoreWhat is the Office policy regarding reexamination when there has been a federal court decision on the merits of a patent?
The Office policy regarding reexamination when there has been a federal court decision on the merits of a patent is outlined in MPEP § 2642 and MPEP § 2686.04. These sections provide guidance on how to handle requests for reexamination and the subsequent examination phase in such cases. According to MPEP § 2659, “Claims finally…
Read More