Is it possible to revive a reexamination proceeding based on unavoidable delay?

No, it is no longer possible to revive a reexamination proceeding based on unavoidable delay. The MPEP clearly states: “37 CFR 1.137 was revised to implement the changes in the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012 (PLTIA) to eliminate revival of an abandoned application and reexamination prosecution terminated under § 1.550(d) under the ‘unavoidable’…

Read More

What is the process for reviewing new matter objections or rejections?

The process for reviewing new matter objections or rejections can vary depending on the specific circumstances. According to MPEP 2163.06: Typically, an objection is petitionable, while a rejection is appealable. However, when the objection is “determinative of the rejection,” such as when the examiner has indicated that the disclosure contains new matter, the issue may…

Read More

What are the key steps in reviewing claims during patent examination?

Reviewing claims is a crucial part of patent examination. According to MPEP 2103, the key steps in reviewing claims are: Identify and evaluate each claim limitation: For processes, identify steps or acts to be performed For products, identify discrete physical structures or materials Correlate claim limitations with the disclosure: Match each claim limitation to portions…

Read More

What is the review process after an examiner completes an action in inter partes reexamination?

After an examiner completes an action in inter partes reexamination, it undergoes a review process. The MPEP outlines this process: “After the conference, the proceeding, with the completed action, will be forwarded to the CRU Supervisory Patent Reexamination Specialist (SPRS) or Technology Center (TC) Quality Assurance Specialist (QAS) for review.” If corrections or revisions are…

Read More