How should experimental data and examples be presented in a patent application?
When presenting experimental data and examples in a patent application:
- Ensure accuracy of all statements and evidence
- Clearly distinguish between actual results and predicted results
- Use proper tense: past tense for actual experiments, present or future tense for prophetic examples
- Label examples as prophetic or working examples to avoid ambiguities
MPEP 2004 advises: “Care should be taken to see that inaccurate statements, inaccurate evidence or inaccurate experiments are not introduced into the record, either inadvertently or intentionally.” It further states: “Paper or prophetic examples should not be described using the past tense.”
To learn more:
Topics:
MPEP 2000 - Duty Of Disclosure,
MPEP 2004 - Aids To Compliance With Duty Of Disclosure,
Patent Law,
Patent Procedure