How does the USPTO determine if a reply to an Office action is considered insufficient?
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
The USPTO determines if a reply to an Office action is insufficient based on whether it addresses all the objections, requirements, and rejections set forth in the Office action. According to MPEP 711.02(a):
“A reply to a non-final Office action is not responsive unless it either contests or adopts every ground of rejection or objection made in the Office action, and presents arguments pointing out the specific distinctions believed to render the claims patentable.”
This means that to be considered sufficient, a reply must:
- Address every rejection and objection raised in the Office action
- Either contest the rejections/objections with arguments or adopt the examiner’s suggestions
- Provide specific arguments explaining why the claims are patentable
If a reply fails to meet these criteria, it may be considered insufficient, potentially leading to abandonment of the application.
- Express Abandonment of Patent ApplicationMPEP 711Permitted
- Declaration Required for Abandonment of Patent ApplicationMPEP 711Permitted
- Abandonment for Nonresponsive ReplyMPEP 711.02(a)
- Requirement for Fully Responsive ReplyMPEP 711.02(a)Permitted
- Reply Required to Save Application from AbandonmentMPEP 711Required