How does the specification’s guidance affect the assessment of experimentation?
The guidance provided in the specification plays a crucial role in assessing whether the required experimentation is reasonable or undue. The MPEP addresses this in section 2164.06:
“[A]n extended period of experimentation may not be undue if the skilled artisan is given sufficient direction or guidance.”
Key points to consider:
- Clear and detailed instructions in the specification can justify more extensive experimentation
- The specification should provide a “reasonable amount of guidance” on how to perform the experimentation
- Lack of guidance may make even a small amount of experimentation “undue”
In essence, the more detailed and helpful the guidance in the specification, the more experimentation can be considered reasonable and not “undue.”
To learn more:
Topics:
MPEP 2100 - Patentability,
MPEP 2164.06 - Quantity Of Experimentation,
Patent Law,
Patent Procedure