How does the concept of long-felt need impact the assessment of non-obviousness in patent examination?
The concept of long-felt need plays a significant role in assessing non-obviousness during patent examination. According to MPEP 716.04, long-felt need can provide strong evidence against obviousness. Here’s how it impacts the assessment:
- Indicates non-obvious solution: A long-felt need suggests that the solution was not obvious to those skilled in the art. If the solution were obvious, it likely would have been implemented earlier.
- Demonstrates technical challenge: The persistence of the need indicates that the problem was technically challenging, supporting the non-obviousness of the solution.
- Counters prima facie obviousness: Evidence of long-felt need can be used to rebut a prima facie case of obviousness established by the examiner.
- Supports inventive step: When combined with evidence of the failure of others, long-felt need strongly suggests an inventive step in the claimed invention.
- Indicates commercial success: Fulfilling a long-felt need often correlates with commercial success, which is another secondary consideration for non-obviousness.
The MPEP emphasizes that the claimed invention must actually satisfy the long-felt need. As stated in the case In re Cavanagh, cited in the MPEP, the invention must in fact satisfy the long-felt need
.
When presenting arguments based on long-felt need, applicants should clearly demonstrate how their invention addresses a persistent, recognized problem that others in the field failed to solve, thereby supporting its non-obviousness.
To learn more: