How does filing a reply brief with an amendment affect a patent appeal?
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
Filing a reply brief with an amendment can have significant implications for a patent appeal. The MPEP 1208 provides specific guidance on this situation:
“If a reply brief is filed in response to a substitute examiner’s answer under 37 CFR 41.50(a) that was written in response to a remand by the Board for further consideration of a rejection, any reply brief accompanied by an amendment, affidavit or other evidence will be treated as a request that prosecution be reopened before the examiner.”
In essence, submitting a reply brief with an amendment in response to a substitute examiner’s answer may result in the reopening of prosecution before the examiner, rather than continuing with the appeal process. This highlights the importance of carefully considering the content and timing of reply brief submissions.
- Substitute Examiner’s Answer May Set New Rejection GroundsMPEP 1207.05Permitted
- Single Reply Brief Within Two MonthsMPEP 1208
- Requirement for Reply Brief After Examiner’s AnswerMPEP 1208Required
- Two-Month Reply Brief Period After Petition DenialMPEP 1208Permitted
- Single Reply Brief Within Two MonthsMPEP 1208Permitted
- Appellant Must File Reply Brief Within Two MonthsMPEP 1208Required
- No New Evidence in Reply BriefMPEP 1208