How does an examiner determine if new matter is present in a continuation or divisional application?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-09

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

Patent examiners carefully compare the content of the continuation or divisional application with the prior-filed application to identify any new matter. If they find information not disclosed in the prior application, they will issue a notice to the applicant.

The MPEP ¶ 2.10.01 instructs examiners:

“In bracket 1, provide an example of the matter not disclosed in the prior-filed application.”

This means the examiner must specifically point out the new matter found in the application, allowing the applicant to understand and address the issue.

For more information on continuation application, visit: continuation application.

For more information on Divisional application, visit: Divisional application.

For more information on new matter, visit: new matter.

For more information on patent examination, visit: patent examination.

Topics: MPEP 200 - Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority MPEP 211 - Claiming the Benefit of an Earlier Filing Date Under 35 U.S.C. 120 and 119(e) Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Chain Of Copendency, Filing Before Abandonment, Ida Mandatory Elements, Priority Benefit, sir waiver