How does a priority showing differ from a 37 CFR 1.131 affidavit?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
A priority showing under 37 CFR 41.202(d) differs from a 37 CFR 1.131 affidavit in several key aspects:
- A 37 CFR 1.131 affidavit is typically used to overcome rejections under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or 102(e).
- A priority showing is required when the reference has claims directed to the same patentable invention as the application claims being rejected.
- The MPEP states: “The reason for this exception is that priority is determined in an interference when the claims interfere. See pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 135(a).”
In cases where interference is not possible (e.g., claims have been significantly modified or are not in condition for allowance), a 37 CFR 1.131 affidavit may be permitted instead of a priority showing.
Topics:
MPEP 2300 - Interference And Derivation Proceedings
MPEP 2305 - Requiring A Priority Showing
Patent Law
Patent Procedure